Posts Tagged ‘Gramophone’

Bill Drummond – A History Of Music: Part 19, 2 of 4

Friday, December 4th, 2009

This is part 2 of a 4 part serialisation of an analysis on the current state of not just the music industry but music itself by Bill Drummond of the KLF. It is transcribed from an original radio broadcast on BBC Radio 3. You will find part 1, here.

From around the turn of the century up to the first world war there were three towering composers from the western classical school making their greatest work. These three were Sebelius, Stravinsky and Shoenberg. If you were to read the historical achievements of these three you would learn that they, in completely different ways took apart how music was made and put it back together using scales, sounds and methods never before heard by western ears. On a personal level I have been a great fan of recordings of the music that they composed in those years. The same time as Sebelius, Stravinsky and Shoenberg were being revolutionary geniuses there was an Itlaian tenor who sang no new ground breaking music, but stuck to the tried and tested cannon of popular operatic arias. Unwittingly this singer was far more revolutionary than my three heroes.

He was Enrico Caruso and between 1902 and 1921 when he died at the age of 48 he had made over 260 recordings. These recordings sold in millions around the globe. Caruso was the first superstar of the new century. What Caruso did was change of how vast swathes of the human population related to music. In every continent, people were buying Gramophones and records and listening to them in their homes, in their own homes. This was changing all the rules that music had lived by since whenever music was first created thousands and thousands of years ago. People could listen to their Caruso day and night or at least until the neighbours complained. They could take the Gramophone into any room in the house, they could even take it out into the garden if they had one. For all the revolutionary genius of Sebelius, Stravinsky or Shoenberg they changed nothing. The way their music existed and was communicated to its audience could have been done in 1876. Enrico Carruso left them all standing.

Record breaking new ground

Record breaking new ground

From here on in all forms of music that existed anywhere in the world were helpless to the charms of evolving recording technology. Suddenly any music from any era could be recorded and these recordings could be played whenever the owner of the Gramophone liked. Music that previously would only be heard at coronations or marching into war or on a bandstand in the park or in a Parisian nightclub could be heard wherever. People began to collect records, to have an almost fetish like relationship with the physical objects. All around the developed world our relationship with music was completely and utterly changing. And the vast majority of us thought this was fantastic. From a political point of view, it was total democratisation of the art. We could all hear the greatest performances of the century in our front rooms. No need to be at La Scala or the Bolshoi or a whore-house in New Orleans to hear the greatest music the world had to offer. It did not seem to matter that we could never relate to music again in the way people had done only a few decades earlier.

Workin' on the chain gang

Workin' on the chain gang


In the 1930s John Lomax the American musicologist and folklorist started to criss-cross the United States with a portable recording machine in the back of his car. Everywhere he went he would record the folk songs being sung by the poor, the imprisoned, the outcast. Music that no one in cultured society would have ever bothered with before. Music that had been here today and gone tomorrow or passed down from generation to generation was captured for eternity on Lomax’s recording device. This music would be collected as treasure for the Library of Congress. Now that people had Gramophones or radios to hear recorded music on nobody needed to create their own folk music any more. The irony was this machine that was responsible for folk musics slow death was going around the country to record it in its death throws. I for one am eternally grateful for Lomax and that he did what he did, even though it marked the end of a line that had gone on for thousands of years. By now the musicians union were becoming fearful that the fast developing recording technology would make working musicians jobless. They were right to be fearful.

More and more people were choosing to listen to professionally performed recorded music, rather than the shoddy and amatuerish live performances of local musicians. Fast forward a couple of decades to the mid 1950′s. A teenager walks into a small recording studio in Memphis, Tennessee. He wanted to have himself recorded singing some songs for his mother. This lad had only ever sung in public a few times and even then it was as an amateur. Any aspirations he had to being a professional singer would have been mere daydreams. The owner of the studio heard the boy sing and thought he had something so signed him to a recording contract. I guess, you’ve already guessed that the teenager in question was Elvis Presley arguably the most influential musician of the 20th century. The difference between Carruso and Presley was that Carruso was already a highly regarded opera singer before his voice was recorded. Before Elvis had walked into the Sun Recording Studio he was a nobody with no obvious talent.

To be continued…

KLF – Official Website

BBC – Radio 3

John Lomax – Biography

Bill Drummond – A History Of Music: Part 19, 1 of 4

Wednesday, December 2nd, 2009

Here you will find a serialisation of a transcript of a talk which Bill Drummond of 80′s multimedia art project The KLF gave to BBC Radio 3 regarding the music industry. The KLF were a pop sensation throughout the 80′s and early 90′s, but unlike their contemporaries they were deliberately repetitive and derivative in an effort to highlight the ridiculousness of pop music at the time. The talk will be serialised in 4 parts as the whole lot at once would probably be a bit much. The idea of recorded music as “product” is, he thinks, an outdated concept unique to the 20th century that spawned it. The rapid collapse in value of recorded music is, he thinks, A Good Thing. In the future, music can once again become connected with time, place and occasion. And of course with musicians. We give you, A History Of Music: Part 19…

That’s the title of this talk. What parts 1, 2, 3, 7, 11 ,13 or 17 were, or are, is almost irrelevant to this talk. That said, I want to start by reading something which I wrote almost a year ago and is taken from the history of music part 17, this is it: All recorded music that has ever meant anything to you or me or anybody else is speeding its way towards irrelevance. The whole cannon of recorded music that has been stockpiled over the past one-hundred and ten years is going rotten. Rapidly losing any meaning for anybody except historians and those that want to exploit our weakness for nostalgia. The very urge to make recorded music is a redundant and creative dead end, not even an interesting option fit only for the makers of advertising, ring tones and motion picture soundtracks. The sheer ubiquity and availability of recorded music will inspire forward looking music makers to explore different ways of creating music – away from ways which can be captured on a CD, downloaded from the internet and consumed on an MP3 player. The very making of recording music will seem an entirely two-dimensional, 20th century aspiration, for the creative music makers of the next few decades. They will want to make music that celebrates time, place, occasion. They may be those that want to keep the craft of recorded music alive, but we will look upon them as those who work with bygone art-forms – irrelevant in tomorrow’s world.

The kids today have a different perspective

The kids today have a different perspective


I can’t wait to hear the music that is being made in 100 years from now, these notions keep me awake at night. There is no way that I want to hazard a guess what the music in 10 years time or even 100 years will sound like and mean to us. We will have to wait and hear. Instead I’m going to give a brief skim through the salient turning points as music has evolved over the past 131 years. You might think it a highly subjective skim through. I accept that your parallel history of music might be totally different to mine.

In 1876 to hear music, you had to play an instrument or sing yourself. If not you could listen to other people playing or singing. All music that was written or performed was conceived to be listened to in a specific context. This could be religious songs to fit the religious calender. Or ones marked to celebrate the major milestones in life – birth, marriage, death. Or songs sung in the workplace to make the workload seem lighter and the hours speed by. Or regal music to crown a new monarch. Or marshal music to stir our sense of nationalism in times of war. This can literally be music to march into battle with. Or just music to have a good old knees up on a Saturday night. Remove the context from any of these examples I have given and the music will lose its potency and meaning and become something else altogether.

On a surface level the music stays the same but our relationship changes, it is our relationship with music that defines what music is, not what the composer dreamed up or what the musicians thought they were playing. So that was in 1876 and everything that had gone before. In 1877, the American inventor Thomas Edison invented a device he named the phonograph. It was a wax cylinder and on it he recorded himself reciting Mary Had A Little Lamb. His recording was not musical, but that technological development would have more influence on music of the 20th century than anything else that happened in the 19th century, be it the music composed by Beethoven or the music sung by cotton pickers in the slave plantations of ol’ dixie.

Ten years later an American, another American, Emille Berliner took Edison’s idea and ran with it. In 1887 Berliner patented his Gramophone – that is Gramophone with a capital “G”. On this he could play flat circular record things, that he also invented. And on these flat circular records, Berliner was having music recorded, not just himself reciting nursery rhymes. By 1892 he was selling these records and his Gramophones to play them on. This was the moment when music could be contained within a physical object that could be bought and sold. Thus the record industry was born. A small aside that I would like to make here is that within a few months of the first record and Gramophone being sold, the musicians union was formed in Manchester.

To be continued…

KLF – Official Website

BBC – Radio 3

Wax cylinder preservation and digitisation project